“Sexual
energy can have many transformations: at the lowest it is biological; at the
highest it is spiritual. It has to be understood that all creative people are
highly sexual." Osho
There are
many ways a writer can show the true nature of their characters. By placing
them in conflict with their world at various levels and forcing them to make
choices, the fundamental essence of the character is revealed. In thrillers,
lives are at stake. In mysteries, justice often hangs in the balance. Every
genre of fiction has its conflict conventions, but sexual expression is an unused goldmine for the revelation of character,
especially in spy fiction.
Sex for Characterization
Last month, I
discussed the difference between characterizations and true nature in
fiction writing. In short, characterizations are the definable qualities of a
person and their true nature is the choices they make under pressure. As a
vehicle of characterization, sex is used all the time. The male hero falls for
the femme fatale. Now we know some characteristics of both of them. The man is heterosexual
and sexually active. The woman is on some level attractive. This basic idea can
be expanded indefinitely. The unquenchable sexual appetite of James
Bond, for instance, is as much a part of his character as his nationality.
But even this high profile sexual expression doesn’t speak to the true nature
of the character.
Sex for
True Nature
If sexual
expression is going to be used to reveal true nature, then the sexual choices
that a character makes need to be explored. There are a variety of questions
that can be asked to further this goal:
- Who are they sexual with? Are they alone? Are they with one person and not another? Why?
- When are they sexual? Under what circumstances and at what point in the story does the event take place?
- Where are they sexual? Is there some risk based on the location or do they insist on total privacy and security?
- What sexual acts are they involved in? How vanilla or kinky are they? How simple or intricate are their thoughts or actions during the sexual encounter?
- Why are they taking this action? Is it the release of some emotion, if so, which emotion? Is the expression designed as a reward for someone or as a punishment for someone else, or both? Is it a celebration or a submission?
- How are they sexual? Is the character kind or cruel? Are they considerate or selfish? Are they experienced or naïve? Are they exploratory or conservative? Are they active or passive? This is perhaps the most important question when sexual expression is used to define true nature.
When you look
at sexual expression from this perspective, the true nature of James Bond (at
least the movie portrayals of him) is never revealed. We know he has a lot of
sex. We know he is very eclectic in his sexual tastes, but beyond that, Mr.
Bond is a mystery even after six decades of films.
So What?
Can we know a
protagonist’s true nature without watching her in bed? Of course we can.
Millions of fine books have been written over the years without it. So why
should anyone want to put it in now? The answer boils down to creativity. In a
time where everything has already been done and a fresh new idea is as rare as
a winning lotto ticket, using sexual
expression to gain insight into character and move the narrative is the road
less traveled and could be the ripest avenue for exploration in modern
fiction.
Sex in My
Novel
I’m currently
writing a novel called a Taste of Honey.
It this story, sexual expression exposes both the characterizations and the
true nature of all the main players. Instead of writing yet another novel about
assassinations, bombings and hand to hand combat, I’m crafting a spy story that
is more subtle in its execution. The stakes are still very high and the tension
isn’t reduced because there are less bullets flying. I just decided to write a
different type of spy novel. Hopefully the world will be ready to enjoy it.
Repression,
Rejection and Titillation
There is a
reason why more writers do not use sexual expression as a vehicle to reveal true
nature. The
stigma attached to sexual expression in America has a chilling effect that
marginalizes sex to the fringes of pornography. There are few ‘legitimate’
writers who are in a position to take this bold step under their own name.
Anais Nin and Henry Miller did it in their prose. Anne Rice did it with
Sleeping Beauty and Barry
Eisler has taken steps in that direction with his spy fiction. I’m going to
follow them because these are the stories I want to tell and I don’t have anything
to lose.
Sex for the
sake of defining character is fine. Sex for pure titillation is great too. But
I’d like to go in a different direction and see where it takes me. It might not
make me rich, but it will definitely be interesting.
Have fun.
G
G
No comments:
Post a Comment