Question:
What do Hannibal Lecter (Silence of the
Lambs), Ellen Ripley (Aliens) and
Rick Blaine (Casablanca) have in
common?
Answer: Each
of these heroes gained enduring popularity based on the complexity of their character.
All great fictional characters from
Hamlet to Harry Potter hold our interest because their characterizations
contradict their true natures.
As a writer and student of the craft, I want to look at this contradiction in
depth.
Characterization
vs. True Nature
In his
screenwriting guide Story, Robert
McKee defines characterization as “the
sum total of all knowable qualities about a character.” This means the physical,
intellectual, social, financial and spiritual traits that a writer can describe
about the individuals they create. True
character (or as I like to call it, true nature) is a product of the
character’s interaction with your plot, because the choices they make under
pressure reveal their fundamental personality. As McKee states, “what they
choose is who they are”.
In the most
complex and interesting characters, the true nature is in direct contradiction
to the characterizations. For example:
- Hannibal Lecter is a calm, polite, and intelligent gentleman until the FBI lies to him and sends him to suffer at the hands of a sadistic warden. He escapes by revealing a cunning, ruthless and cannibalistic nature that has shocked audiences for years after the film was first released.
- Ellen Ripley is a terrified, burned out engineer until she loses her surrogate child to xenomorphs. She saves the child by revealing a courageous survivor with an intense maternal instinct.
- Rick Blaine is an aloof and mercenary bar owner until the love of his life returns with the Nazis on her tail. This is when he reveals his true character as a patriotic and sentimental hero.
Fallen
Heroes
Many weak characters fail to capture
our imaginations because they have little depth; their characterizations and
their true character are essentially the same. This is especially true in adventure and spy novels. At
the beginning of the story, the protagonist projects the image of a bad ass.
The plot progresses and the protagonist goes through the motions of proving he’s
a bad ass. The story ends. There is no revelation. There is no depth of
character for us to enjoy. The hero is a clichéd caricature of every Tom Cruise
or Steven Segal action hero; flat and interchangeable.
Lessons
Learned
Both novels I
plan to release this year strive to have revelations of true nature vs.
characterizations for both the protagonist and the antagonist. As the events of
the story place the characters desires into conflict, the development of the plot
will not only resolve the story but provide insight into who these people
really are. In some ways, I hope that reading about my characters will illuminate
something about the reader as well as the writer. That is the goal of any
artist.
So who are
your favorite characters?
How does
their complexity play into your desire to read about them?
For the
writers out there, how do you create complex characters in your own writing?
Have fun.
G
Fabulous post, Gamal. A lot there to ponder. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteI'm looking forward to your actual novels. I'm not such a big fan of shorts. Why, I don't know. I just think that you will come out with some excellent stuff in 80k or so words.
Thank you sir. I'm planning to release a full novel for the holiday season, and I'm planning to release another novel in the summer that ties together all my novellas. I hope you like the novels as much as you like the blog. :)
ReplyDeleteHave fun.
Gamal